• Income Taxation
    • International Taxation
      • Real Estate Taxation
        • VAT
          • Trusts

            Corporate Residence (November, 18, 2009)

            1.Facts


            1.1"Construction Company” and "Management Company” were incorporated in Country "A”.


            1.2The companies under consideration are actively engaged in business in Country B wherein the Construction Company is engaged in the construction of a public facility while Management Company runs another public facility.

             

            1.3The companies are owned by "C”, an Israeli tax resident who is the sole director of the companies. Half of the shares are held by "C” in trust for "D” – his business partner, which is a non-Israeli resident based on a legal opinion.


            1.4In order to operate and run the companies, "C” often lands in "B” and sojourns there for a few consecutive weeks.


            1.5The companies have a work force active in "B” as well as a service company in Israel with a local office employee for purchasing equipment and recruiting personnel.

             

            1.6The companies are liable to tax in "B”.


            2.Issue


            What are, if any, the Israeli tax ramifications of the operations of the companies?


            3.Conclusions


            3.1The opinion examined the statutory provisions relevant to the determination of the fiscal residence of a corporation. Since the companies were incorporated outside Israel they could only be held Israeli tax residents if the "control and management” of their businesses was in Israel. The opinion sets forth the "do” and "don’t” recommendations to avoid Israeli residence and stresses the need to place the "brain” of the companies outside Israel. It therefore recommends that the Board of Directors include non-residents and that the activities of the Israeli service company be strictly limited to purchasing and recruiting. The opinion concludes that if implemented, its recommendations will render the companies non-resident status.


            3.2The opinion also deals with the definition of a Controlled Foreign Company and a Foreign Vocation Company and denies their applicability to the Companies (active business and the fact that a business cannot, by definition, be a profession, respectively).

            A.Rafael & co | Law Office |  © 2010
            Tivonet